ArticleFrontiers in radiology2026
Self-adaptive forward-forward network for anomaly detection and medical image analysis.
Article in Frontiers in radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Robust anomaly and out-of-distribution (OOD) detection in radiology demands learning methods that are accurate, interpretable, computationally efficient, and reliable under real-world distributional shifts. Existing back-propagation-trained models often struggle to meet these requirements simultaneously, while forward-forward learning, despite its conceptual appeal as a resource-efficient and biologically plausible alternative, has so far seen limited adoption in image-based and safety-critical medical applications due to scalability and generalisation limitations. Methods: We revisit back-propagation-free learning for the open-world clinical setting and discuss the Convolutional Forward-Forward Algorithm (CFFA), a parameter-efficient reformulation of the Forward-Forward Algorithm tailored to high-dimensional medical image analysis. CFFA incorporates convolutional structure and layer-wise local objectives, overcoming key scalability and generalisation limitations of existing forward-forward approaches while retaining their resource-efficient training paradigm. Building on the observation that the forward-forward objective yields intrinsic and interpretable goodness statistics that directly quantify conformity to the learned data distribution, we introduce SaFF-AD, a self-adaptive forward-forward network explicitly designed for anomaly and OOD detection. SaFF-AD autonomously configures optimisation dynamics, architectural depth, and goodness normalisation, enabling stable learning under constrained computational budgets and in one-shot training regimes. Results: Extensive experiments across multiple medical imaging benchmarks demonstrate that SaFF-AD achieves competitive or superior anomaly detection performance compared to back-propagation-trained models, while requiring substantially fewer parameters and forward evaluations. The forward-forward goodness signal enables self-supervised anomaly and OOD detection without auxiliary networks, post-hoc uncertainty estimation, or heuristically designed scoring functions. Discussion: These results establish forward-forward learning as a viable and practically attractive alternative to conventional deep learning for safety-critical medical image analysis, particularly in settings characterised by constrained computational budgets, limited labelled data, and distributional uncertainty. By treating anomaly detection as an intrinsic property of the learned model rather than a post-hoc addition, SaFF-AD offers a unified framework that is interpretable, efficient, and well-suited to the open-world conditions encountered in real-world clinical deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.