Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42368764›Full record

ArticleGynecology and minimally invasive therapy

A Case of Fallopian Tubal Mole Laparoscopically Treated before Tubal Rupture and a 5-year Literature Review.

Minori Ogawa, Tomohiko Takei, Chie Nakamura, Ryota Kumasaka, Akiko Otake, Norichika Ushioda, Yoshimitsu Yamamoto, Itsuko Nakamichi, Kazushige Adachi

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Minori OgawaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Minoh City Hospital, Minoh, Osaka, Japan.
Tomohiko TakeiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Minoh City Hospital, Minoh, Osaka, Japan.
Chie NakamuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Minoh City Hospital, Minoh, Osaka, Japan.
Ryota KumasakaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Minoh City Hospital, Minoh, Osaka, Japan.
Akiko OtakeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Minoh City Hospital, Minoh, Osaka, Japan.
Norichika UshiodaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Minoh City Hospital, Minoh, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshimitsu YamamotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Minoh City Hospital, Minoh, Osaka, Japan.
Itsuko NakamichiDepartment of Pathology, Minoh City Hospital, Minoh, Osaka, Japan.
Kazushige AdachiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Minoh City Hospital, Minoh, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A healthy 29-year-old woman visited the clinic with a positive pregnancy test result. At 8 weeks, ultrasonography showed no fetal sac in the uterus, and an unevenly thickened endometrium and lutein cyst in the right adnexa, and no ascites. Beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG) level was 67,780 mIU/mL, but no symptoms were observed. Therefore, the uterine contents were removed, and pathological examination detected no chorionic villi in the uterus. At 9 weeks, there was a 43 mm isomass in the right adnexa. An magnetic resonance imaging was performed on the same day. A mass of 43 mm in the right fallopian tube, along with high hCG level, led to the decision to perform a salpingectomy. Pathological examination confirmed a partial hydatidiform mole in the right fallopian tube. The beta-hCG level steadily decreased after the removal of the mole. We report a case of a fallopian tubal mole successfully treated laparoscopically before tubal rupture.

Indexed as

Case reportfallopian tubal moleminimally invasive therapypartial hydatidiform mole

Identifiers

PMID42368764
PMCPMC13299087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.