Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42368738›Full record

ArticleJournal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques2026

Endorelining endovascular aortic repair using an iliac branch endoprosthesis in cases requiring secondary intervention following endovascular aortic repair or grafting.

Tomohiro Takano, Yoshiaki Katada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tomohiro TakanoDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nagano Red Cross Hospital, Nagano and Ibaraki, Japan.
Yoshiaki KatadaDivision of Radiology, Tokyo Medical University Ibaraki Medical Center, Ibaraki, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment of artificial graft deterioration in the long-term follow-up period after abdominal aortic repair must be carefully considered. We performed endorelining endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in two cases. In both cases, the length between the lower renal artery and the bifurcation was too short to perform EVAR with commercially abdominal devices. Therefore, an iliac branch endoprosthesis (IBE) was used. Although pulling the deployed IBE down was difficult without the use of a custom-made snare, both procedures were successful, and postoperative computed tomography scans showed no extravascular leakage in the aneurysm sac. Endorelining EVAR using IBE is feasible in high-risk elderly patients.

Indexed as

Abdominal aortic aneurysmEndoleakEndoreliningEndovascular treatment/therapyGraft deterioration

Identifiers

PMID42368738
PMCPMC13293680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.