ArticleRadiology research and practice2026
Incidental Breast Findings on Chest CT: Rates of Report and Follow-Up.
Article in Radiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Incidental Breast Findings on Chest CT: Rates of Report and Follow-Up.Radiology research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to determine the incidence and types of breast findings detected on chest CTs at our institution and assess rates of subsequent follow-up imaging and breast cancer screening. Methods: A retrospective review of all chest CTs performed at our institution over a 2-year period (1/1/2022-1/1/2024) was conducted, demonstrating 1540 patients above the age of 40 with incidental breast findings identified using a text search of the reports, and follow-up recommendations were documented. Clinical outcomes were analyzed for cases with recommended dedicated breast imaging. Results: Incidental breast findings were detected in 14.3% of chest CTs in women above or at the age of 40. Further breast imaging was recommended in 54 cases, with 21 cases having associated dedicated breast imaging performed. Of these, corresponding dedicated workup revealed predominantly benign findings, with 82% representing benign or likely benign etiologies and only 4 cases representing malignancy. The likelihood of performing follow-up imaging was influenced by the language used in the report, with a 40% completion rate for studies using definitive wording as compared to 0% for optional wording. Conclusion: There is a considerable rate of incidental breast findings visualized on chest CTs, which are predominantly benign. However, as there is a potential for visualization of malignant lesions, standardized reporting and follow-up protocols are essential to ensure proper evaluation and management. Further research is needed for evaluating and standardizing the potential use of chest CTs for assessing incidental breast lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.