Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42368708›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026

Interpretable machine learning models for predicting perioperative myocardial injury in non-cardiac surgery.

Benjamin Sailer, Sibel Sari-Yavuz, Stephanie Biergans, Raphael Verbücheln, Lars-Christian Achauer, Peter Rosenberger, Michaela Hardt, Michael Koeppen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Benjamin SailerMedical Data Integration Center, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8216-7390
Sibel Sari-YavuzDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, Tübingen 72076, Germany.
Stephanie BiergansMedical Data Integration Center, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0120-1301
Raphael VerbüchelnMedical Data Integration Center, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9664-7981
Lars-Christian AchauerMedical Data Integration Center, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4182-6126
Peter RosenbergerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, Tübingen 72076, Germany.
Michaela HardtMedical Data Integration Center, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2459-8443
Michael KoeppenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, Tübingen 72076, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5002-1286

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Perioperative myocardial injury (PMI) is a frequent and often asymptomatic complication after non-cardiac surgery and is associated with increased short- and long-term mortality. Conventional risk scores, such as the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI), have limited predictive accuracy and are infrequently used in clinical practice. We aimed to develop and temporally validate an interpretable machine learning model using Explainable Boosting Machines (EBMs) to predict PMI from routine pre-operative data. Methods and results: In this retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care centre in Germany, we included 9323 adult patients undergoing 9824 non-cardiac surgical procedures between 2014 and 2023 who received post-operative high-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing as part of routine care. PMI was defined as a post-operative elevation of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin above the upper reference limit. An EBM was trained on structured pre-operative data from 2014 to 2021 and evaluated in a temporally independent test cohort from 2022 to 2023, with performance compared with logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, and a modified RCRI. Model discrimination, calibration, and Brier scores were assessed. Feature contributions were examined using internal shape functions and SHAP values. PMI occurred in 2804 procedures (28.5%). The EBM achieved the highest predictive performance (AUROC 0.730, 95% CI 0.720-0.740), outperforming all comparators. Calibration was robust across clinically relevant risk ranges. Key predictors included age, leukocyte count, renal function, potassium, and platelet count. The EBM identified high-risk patients more efficiently than the modified RCRI and ESC guideline-based strategies (Number Needed to Evaluate 3.0 vs. 3.5) and reduced troponin assays by 18.2% in the temporally independent cohort. Conclusion: An interpretable machine learning model trained on routine clinical data can accurately predict PMI and outperform existing risk scores. The EBM supports individualized risk stratification and may enhance perioperative decision-making and resource allocation within a guideline-directed testing population. Prospective and external validation is required before clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Explainable boosting machinesMachine learningNon-cardiac surgeryPerioperative myocardial injuryRisk prediction model

Identifiers

PMID42368708
PMCPMC13310016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.