ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2026
Pre-emptive versus empirical antifungal therapy in patients with febrile neutropenia with acute leukaemia: a GIMEMA study.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the efficacy of pre-emptive antifungal therapy (PAT) and empirical antifungal therapy (EAT) in patients with febrile neutropenic acute leukaemia (AL) with/without anti-mold prophylaxis. Methods: We included 92 patients with AL and neutropenia with fever unresponsive to empiric antibiotics, stratified by posaconazole prophylaxis to receive EAT ( Results: Posaconazole prophylaxis was equally distributed among the patients (overall 55.4%). Antifungal therapy was started in 58% of the patients in the PAT group versus 100% in the EAT group ( Conclusions: In patients with persistently febrile neutropenic AL, PAT was safe and effective and reduced the use and costs of antifungals, irrespective of anti-mold prophylaxis, compared with empirical treatment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.