ArticleThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne2026
Influences of measurement environment and owner presence on in-clinic blood pressure in dogs.
Article in The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective and animals: The objective of this study was to evaluate effects of measurement environment and owner presence on oscillometric blood pressure (BP) values in 14 clinically healthy dogs. Procedure: Without removing the cuff, noninvasive BP measurements were taken in 3 consecutive in-clinic situations: Situations 1) a quiet waiting room with only the owner present, 2) an examination room with the owner and veterinary personnel present, and 3) an examination room without the owner present. Only measurements with bell-shaped oscillograms were considered valid. Systolic, diastolic, and mean BP; pulse pressure; pulse rate; percentage of valid measurements; and success rate were compared among situations. Results: Systolic and mean BP were significantly higher in the absence of the owner, whereas no significant differences were observed among other parameters. The overall success rate of obtaining 5 consecutive valid measurements was low (26.2%). Conclusion and clinical relevance: We concluded that owner absence was associated with higher in-clinic BP values and may influence BP assessment in dogs. Results supported measuring BP with the owner present under standardized conditions in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42368686PMC13295199What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.