ReviewCurrent urology2026
The regulatory mechanism and clinical significance of RNA editing in prostate cancer.
Review in Current urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common malignancies in men and remains particularly challenging as it progresses to the castration-resistant stage. Increasing evidence indicates that dysregulated RNA editing plays an active role in PCa progression and resistance to therapy. Among these modifications, adenosine-to-inosine editing catalyzed by adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 1 (ADAR1) alters transcripts, such as androgen receptor (AR) and antizyme inhibitor 1, promoting androgen-independent growth, metastasis, and immune evasion. Conversely, cytidine-to-uridine editing mediated by apolipoprotein B mRNA editing catalytic polypeptide-like 3 (APOBEC3) enzymes contributes to genomic instability. For example, APOBEC3B induces mutagenesis and resistance to AR-targeted therapy, and APOBEC3C functions as a context-dependent tumor suppressor that is transcriptionally repressed by the AR in advanced disease. Clinically, RNA editing signatures, including APOBEC3C expression levels, have shown promise as biomarkers for risk stratification, disease monitoring, and prognosis. Therapeutically, inhibition of ADAR1 or APOBEC3B, restoration of APOBEC3C activity, and site-specific corrective RNA editing using the CRISPR-ADAR2 platform represent emerging precision strategies. Ongoing development of small-molecule inhibitors, oligonucleotide-based modulators, and liquid biopsy-based detection methods further highlights the translational relevance of RNA editing in PCa. Future research should focus on improving editing specificity, minimizing off-target effects, and validating these biomarkers and therapeutic targets in clinical settings to fully realize the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of RNA editing in the precise management of prostate cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.