ArticleEULAR rheumatology open2025
Optimising the clinical application of rheumatology guidelines using large language models: a retrieval-augmented generation framework integrating EULAR and ACR recommendations.
Article in EULAR rheumatology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Rheumatology and Systemic Inflammatory Diseases: From Pattern Recognition to Signal Analysis and Clinical Decision Support.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Improving Pelvic Floor Disorder Education: A Second Pilot of a Retrieval-Augmented AI Chatbot Model.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Evaluation Methods for Inference-Time Retrieval-Augmented and Graph Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models in Health Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in rheumatology and paediatric rheumatology: insights from an international survey by EMEUNET.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Article
- Low-energy small language models with retrieval-augmented generation can surpass large-model performance in rheumatology.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- From chat to act: large language model agents and agentic AI as the next frontier of AI in rheumatology.EULAR rheumatology open · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Timely access to current rheumatology guidelines at the point of care is challenging. We aimed to develop and evaluate the first retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system designed for adult rheumatology, integrating European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) guidelines to provide rheumatologists with timely evidence-based recommendations. Methods: EULAR and ACR management guidelines were selected by rheumatologists based on their clinical relevance for decision-making and processed. A RAG system was implemented. To evaluate it, 10 questions per guideline were generated using ChatGPT 4.5. Answers to these were produced by ChatGPT-o3-mini with context retrieval (RAG) and without (baseline). Performance was assessed by an Large language model (LLM)-as-a-judge (Gemini 2.0 Flash) using a 5-point Likert scale across 5 dimensions: relevance, factual accuracy, safety, completeness, and conciseness; it also determined preference between the RAG and baseline responses. For validation, 2 rheumatologists independently evaluated a random sample of questions (15%) on the same domains. Statistical significance was established using the Wilcoxon signed-rank and binomial tests. Results: Seventy-four guidelines were included, yielding 740 evaluation questions. The LLM-as-a-judge evaluation showed the RAG system significantly outperformed the baseline across all criteria ( Conclusions: Developing a RAG system integrating extensive EULAR/ACR rheumatology guidelines improves answer quality compared to a baseline LLM. This evaluation provides a robust foundation for reliable, artificial intelligence-driven clinical decision support tools designed to enhance evidence-based practice by providing clinicians with rapid, context-aware access to recommendations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.