ArticleEULAR rheumatology open2025
Effectiveness and safety of antiresorptive drugs in patients with systemic sclerosis-a retrospective monocentric study.
Article in EULAR rheumatology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Osteoporosis treatment in systemic sclerosis : Challenges and strategies in daily clinical practice].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis. Gastrointestinal manifestations of SSc such as dysphagia and chronic gastritis affect up to 90% of patients and thus may impair the efficacy and safety of oral antiresorptive treatments. However, data on the comparative effectiveness and safety of antiresorptive therapies in SSc are lacking. Methods: Patients with SSc treated for osteoporosis at our rheumatology department between 2004 and 2024 were included if they had at least 2 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements 2 years apart (before and during antiresorptive therapy). Primary endpoint was the change in bone mineral density (BMD). Secondary endpoints assessed changes in BMD for individual drugs, with a specific focus on oral compared with parenterally administered drugs. Adverse events were documented descriptively. Results: A total of 42 patients were included. Overall, antiresorptive therapy significantly improved axial BMD (+3.78%, Conclusions: Antiresorptive therapies appear to be effective in patients with SSc. Subgroup analysis suggests that parenteral administration, particularly denosumab, may offer superior efficacy. Gastrointestinal adverse effects were mild and consistent with published rates in the general population, whereas ONJ could be more relevant than in the general population.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.