Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42368599›Full record

ArticleEULAR rheumatology open2025

Effectiveness and safety of antiresorptive drugs in patients with systemic sclerosis-a retrospective monocentric study.

Nils Schulz, Jonas Neumann, Tim Wilhelmi, Pascal van Wijnen, Ulf Müller-Ladner, Philipp Klemm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EULAR rheumatology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nils SchulzDepartment of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology, Osteology and Physical Medicine, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Campus Kerckhoff, Bad Nauheim, Hesse, Germany.
Jonas NeumannDepartment of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology, Osteology and Physical Medicine, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Campus Kerckhoff, Bad Nauheim, Hesse, Germany.
Tim WilhelmiDepartment of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology, Osteology and Physical Medicine, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Campus Kerckhoff, Bad Nauheim, Hesse, Germany.
Pascal van WijnenDepartment of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology, Osteology and Physical Medicine, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Campus Kerckhoff, Bad Nauheim, Hesse, Germany.
Ulf Müller-LadnerDepartment of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology, Osteology and Physical Medicine, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Campus Kerckhoff, Bad Nauheim, Hesse, Germany.
Philipp KlemmDepartment of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology, Osteology and Physical Medicine, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Campus Kerckhoff, Bad Nauheim, Hesse, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis. Gastrointestinal manifestations of SSc such as dysphagia and chronic gastritis affect up to 90% of patients and thus may impair the efficacy and safety of oral antiresorptive treatments. However, data on the comparative effectiveness and safety of antiresorptive therapies in SSc are lacking. Methods: Patients with SSc treated for osteoporosis at our rheumatology department between 2004 and 2024 were included if they had at least 2 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements 2 years apart (before and during antiresorptive therapy). Primary endpoint was the change in bone mineral density (BMD). Secondary endpoints assessed changes in BMD for individual drugs, with a specific focus on oral compared with parenterally administered drugs. Adverse events were documented descriptively. Results: A total of 42 patients were included. Overall, antiresorptive therapy significantly improved axial BMD (+3.78%, Conclusions: Antiresorptive therapies appear to be effective in patients with SSc. Subgroup analysis suggests that parenteral administration, particularly denosumab, may offer superior efficacy. Gastrointestinal adverse effects were mild and consistent with published rates in the general population, whereas ONJ could be more relevant than in the general population.

Identifiers

PMID42368599
PMCPMC13292479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.