ArticleEULAR rheumatology open2025
Pregnancy outcomes of non-tumour necrosis factor inhibitor biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs among individuals with autoimmune diseases: a scoping review and proposed framework for reporting outcomes.
Article in EULAR rheumatology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Scoping review of biosimilar disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in pregnancy: evidence gaps and proposed outcome reporting framework.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) have transformed autoimmune disease treatment. Although the perinatal impacts of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) have been systematically synthesised, comparable evidence syntheses for non-TNFi bDMARDs are lacking. We conducted a scoping review to synthesise evidence on the impact of non-TNFi bDMARDs on pregnancy outcomes. Methods: We searched Embase, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL databases in November 2023. We included studies among individuals with chronic autoimmune disease that examined non-TNFi bDMARD exposure in mothers during pregnancy, fathers prior to conception, and/or foetuses/neonates in utero. We extracted data on sample size, study design, drug exposure (dose and duration), pregnancy outcomes, and synthesised patterns in methodologic reporting. Results: Of 6712 studies screened, 135 were included (38 case reports, 25 case series, 40 cross-sectional, and 32 analytical) among patients with inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis, and rheumatoid arthritis. Ustekinumab, vedolizumab, and tocilizumab were the most studied drugs. The analytical studies assessed 41 pregnancy outcomes, showing significant associations between non-TNFis and preterm birth, congenital anomalies, and miscarriage. For methodologic gaps, we identified substantial heterogeneity across reporting of sample size units, drug exposure (timing and duration), and pregnancy outcomes. In response, we developed a Reproductive Health Outcomes Reporting Framework to standardise reporting according to maternal, foetal/neonatal, and foetal/neonatal-maternal outcomes. Conclusions: Our scoping review shows that the evidence base for the perinatal impacts of non-TNFi DMARDs is growing. Analytic findings identified evidence gaps that limit informed decision-making for patients and providers around pregnancy. Methodologic findings informed our recommendations for improving reporting practices, thereby enhance the comparability and interpretability of results in future perinatal pharmacoepidemiologic research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.