Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42368593›Full record

ArticleEULAR rheumatology open2025

The distinct phenotype of subclinical giant cell arteritis in polymyalgia rheumatica: evidence from a PMR fast-track clinic.

Sharon Cowley, Patricia Harkins, Colm Kirby, Richard Conway, David Kane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EULAR rheumatology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sharon CowleyDepartment of Rheumatology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Patricia HarkinsTrinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Colm KirbyDepartment of Rheumatology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Richard ConwayTrinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
David KaneDepartment of Rheumatology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To define the prevalence and phenotype of subclinical giant cell arteritis (sGCA) in newly diagnosed polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). Methods: This prospective study assessed consecutive patients referred from primary care to a fast-track clinic (FTC) with suspected PMR without GCA features. Patients were compared with a control population which consisted of newly diagnosed, consecutive patients with GCA from an FTC. Assessment included temporal and axillary artery ultrasound and quantitative scoring using Halo count (HC), Halo score (HS), and OMERACT GCA Ultrasound Score (OGUS). Patients with PMR with positive vascular ultrasound findings were diagnosed as sGCA. Cardiovascular risk (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular disease [ASCVD] score) was calculated. Results: Seventy-three new PMR and 24 new patients with GCA were included. Twenty-five percent of patients with PMR had ultrasound-confirmed sGCA. Although predominantly male (80% vs 45%), sGCA could not be otherwise clinically differentiated. PMR with sGCA had more extracranial involvement than GCA (47% vs 33%) with lower baseline OGUS scores (0.81 [±0.17] vs 0.96 [±0.21], Conclusions: This study found that 1 in 5 patients with PMR referred from primary care via an FTC have sGCA. sGCA has a distinct ultrasound phenotype from GCA, with lower vessel wall inflammation quantified by the OGUS, than observed in GCA. A higher clinical and ultrasound relapse rate in patients with sGCA may support closer monitoring and intensive treatment of these patients.

Identifiers

PMID42368593
PMCPMC13292145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.