ArticleEULAR rheumatology open2025
The distinct phenotype of subclinical giant cell arteritis in polymyalgia rheumatica: evidence from a PMR fast-track clinic.
Article in EULAR rheumatology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To define the prevalence and phenotype of subclinical giant cell arteritis (sGCA) in newly diagnosed polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). Methods: This prospective study assessed consecutive patients referred from primary care to a fast-track clinic (FTC) with suspected PMR without GCA features. Patients were compared with a control population which consisted of newly diagnosed, consecutive patients with GCA from an FTC. Assessment included temporal and axillary artery ultrasound and quantitative scoring using Halo count (HC), Halo score (HS), and OMERACT GCA Ultrasound Score (OGUS). Patients with PMR with positive vascular ultrasound findings were diagnosed as sGCA. Cardiovascular risk (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular disease [ASCVD] score) was calculated. Results: Seventy-three new PMR and 24 new patients with GCA were included. Twenty-five percent of patients with PMR had ultrasound-confirmed sGCA. Although predominantly male (80% vs 45%), sGCA could not be otherwise clinically differentiated. PMR with sGCA had more extracranial involvement than GCA (47% vs 33%) with lower baseline OGUS scores (0.81 [±0.17] vs 0.96 [±0.21], Conclusions: This study found that 1 in 5 patients with PMR referred from primary care via an FTC have sGCA. sGCA has a distinct ultrasound phenotype from GCA, with lower vessel wall inflammation quantified by the OGUS, than observed in GCA. A higher clinical and ultrasound relapse rate in patients with sGCA may support closer monitoring and intensive treatment of these patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.