ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
How manure amendment counters no-tillage yield reduction in winter wheat: enhanced nitrogen components and soil enzyme activity.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: No-tillage (NT) effectively reduces soil erosion, enhances water retention, and promotes carbon sequestration, yet it often leads to yield reduction. The application of manure can mitigate the yield decline caused by NT. Therefore, combining NT with manure represents a key strategy for achieving sustainable agriculture. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of organic fertilizer application on soil physicochemical properties in long-term NT farmland, and reveal the regulatory associations of manure on crop yield in such systems. Methods: A split-plot design was employed, with tillage practices (CT and NT) as the main plots and fertilization treatments as sub-plots. The fertilization treatments included: no fertilizer (CK), mineral nitrogen (N), mineral phosphorus (P), manure-only (M); mineral N and P (NP); and combined N, P, and manure (MNP). Results: Compared with CT, NT significantly increased soil carbon fractions (SOC, and MBC by 19.09%, and 14.95%, respectively) and nitrogen fractions (AN and NN by 35.48% and 67.82%, respectively), as well as BD (increased by 11.83%), but decreased soil enzyme activities (CBH and NAG by 9.40% and 9.09%, respectively). In contrast, the combined application of manure increased soil carbon/nitrogen fractions, enzyme activities while effectively reducing soil BD and pH. Specifically, compared with the NP, the MNP treatment increased SOC, TN, AP, AN, CBH, and NAG by 31.25%, 23.67%, 65.35%, 28.48%, 37.33%, and 30.79%, respectively. Under the MNP, yield increased by 9.84% (CT) and 13.40% (NT) compared to the NP treatment. Regression and correlation analyses showed that soil enzyme activities were positively correlated with soil nutrients. Discussion: The interaction between NT and manure application regulated soil physical structure, thereby enhancing the activities of enzymes related to carbon and nitrogen cycling. This led to a significant increase in carbon and nitrogen storage, ultimately improving crop yield. The continuous input of manure and the improved availability of nitrogen fractions were identified as the core factors contributing to the yield gain. This study confirms that no-tillage combined with manure is an effective strategy for coordinating soil carbon sequestration and stable crop yield improvement, providing a feasible management optimization approach for the promotion of no-tillage technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.