ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Divergent environmental constraints shape the spatial patterns of annual gross primary productivity in China's terrestrial ecosystems.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Annual Gross Primary Productivity (AGPP) is a key indicator of terrestrial ecosystem carbon sequestration. However, its spatial variability and biome-specific controls remain poorly understood. Methods: Here, we analyzed AGPP across forests, grasslands, croplands, and wetlands in China using data from 166 eddy covariance flux sites. We applied SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and structural equation modeling (SEM) to quantify the relative importance of environmental variables and to disentangle their direct and indirect effects on AGPP. Results: Our results revealed clear productivity patterns: forests exhibited the highest AGPP, followed by wetlands, croplands, and grasslands. In forests, AGPP was positively associated with temperature and precipitation but negatively related to high vapor pressure deficit (VPD). In grasslands, precipitation enhanced AGPP both directly and indirectly via vegetation structure (leaf area index), whereas excessive radiation constrained productivity. High soil organic carbon (SOC) was associated with lower AGPP in wetlands and croplands, likely reflecting nutrient immobilization under waterlogged conditions and the impacts of intensive agricultural management. Discussion: These findings highlight biome-specific responses of AGPP to climatic conditions, soil properties, and vegetation structure, and provide insights for improving carbon cycle models and guiding targeted ecosystem management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.