Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42368479›Full record

ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2026

Telisotuzumab Vedotin Monotherapy in Patients With Previously Treated c-Met Protein Overexpressing, Nonsquamous,

Nicolas Girard, Jonathan Goldman, Shun Lu, Jair Bar, Hidehito Horinouchi, Nathalie Daaboul, Chunling Liu, Irfan Çiçin, Nuran Katgi, Alona Zer and 17 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03539536 (Phase 2, Open-Label Safety and Efficacy Study of Telisotuzumab Vedotin), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03539536 phase2active not recruitingnot on this map

Phase 2, Open-Label Safety and Efficacy Study of Telisotuzumab Vedotin (ABBV-399) in Subjects With Previously Treated c-Met+ Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorAbbVieRan2018 to 2026Enrolled270ConditionsNon-small Cell Lung CancerArmsTelisotuzumab vedotin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Nicolas GirardDépartement d'Oncologie Médicale, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Jonathan GoldmanDavid Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California.
Shun LuShanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jair BarJusidman Cancer Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Hidehito HorinouchiDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Nathalie DaaboulMontérégie Integrated Cancer Center (CICM), Charles-LeMoyne Hospital, University of Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Chunling LiuThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, People's Republic of China.
Irfan ÇiçinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Istinye University Medical Center, Istanbul, Turkey.
Nuran KatgiDr. Suat Seren Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Izmir, Yenisehir, Turkey.
Alona ZerFishman Oncology Center, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Tudor CiuleanuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institutul Oncologic, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Niels ReinmuthDepartment of Oncology, Asklepios Lung Clinic, German Center for Lung Research, Munich-Gauting, Germany.
David PlanchardDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Se-Hoon LeeSamsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Aaron S MansfieldMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Mor MoskovitzThoracic Cancer Service, Davidoff Cancer Center, Beilinson, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Shobhit BaijalUniversity Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Christina BaikFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, from Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington.
John S HromForrest General Hospital and Hattiesburg Clinic of Hematology and Oncology, Hattiesburg, Mississippi.
Rebecca S HeistMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ozan YaziciDepartment of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Mukesh VermaOncology Development, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois.
Deise UemaOncology Development, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois.
Shilpen PatelOncology Development, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois.
Summer XiaOncology Development, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois.
Christine RatajczakOncology Development, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois.
D Ross CamidgeLineberger Cancer Center, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V) is a c-Met-directed antibody-drug conjugate comprising the monoclonal antibody telisotuzumab and the monomethyl auristatin E payload. Primary analysis of the phase 2 LUMINOSITY trial (NCT03539536) revealed Teliso-V monotherapy 1.9 mg/kg elicited durable responses and had generally manageable safety in patients with locally advanced or metastatic c-Met protein overexpressing, Methods: Patients (≥18 y; had previous therapy including ≤1 chemotherapy) received 1.9 mg/kg Teliso-V every 2 weeks. c-Met protein overexpression (clinical trial assay for MET [SP44] [Roche]) was defined as greater than or equal to 25% tumor cells with 3+ staining intensity (c-Met high: ≥50% 3+; c-Met intermediate: 25 to <50% 3+). Primary end point was the overall response rate by independent central review per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Results: As of February 21, 2024, 172 patients received at least one dose of Teliso-V; 168 patients (c-Met high, n = 84; c-Met intermediate, n = 84) were evaluable for efficacy. The overall response rate was 29.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 22.4-36.7; c-Met high, 34.5% [24.5-45.7]; c-Met intermediate, 23.8% [15.2-34.3]). Median duration of response was 7.2 months (95% CI: 5.5-11.0; c-Met high, 7.2 [95% CI: 4.2-12.0]; c-Met intermediate, 7.2 [95% CI: 4.7-11.5]). Previous therapy (platinum, immune checkpoint inhibitors, or both) did not impact efficacy outcomes. The most common treatment-related adverse event was peripheral sensory neuropathy (any-grade: 31%; grade ≥3: 7%). Conclusions: Teliso-V monotherapy 1.9 mg/kg elicited durable responses, irrespective of the type of previous therapy received, and maintained a manageable safety profile in patients with c-Met protein overexpressing ClinicalTrialsgov ID number: NCT03539536.

Indexed as

Antibody–drug conjugateBiomarkerc-Met proteinNSCLCTelisotuzumab vedotin

Identifiers

PMID42368479
PMCPMC13293683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.