ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2026
Development and application of an artificial intelligence-based quantitative system for white without pressure in myopic retinopathy.
Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantification of Peripheral Blur in Ultra-Widefield Fundus Imaging Following Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
White Without Pressure (WWOP) is a common but under-recognized peripheral retinal finding associated with myopia-related complications, yet its objective assessment remains challenging. This study aimed to develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI) system for the automated segmentation and quantitative assessment of WWOP lesions from ultra-widefield color fundus photographs. The system employs deep learning algorithms for automatic identification and multi-dimensional quantification of WWOP lesions, including WWOP total area, total number, zonal distribution (Area and Number for R1 (posterior pole), R2 (mid-periphery), and R3 (far-periphery)), and global area ratio. Applied to 119 myopic eyes (64 with WWOP, 53.8%), the system revealed that over 96% of the lesion area resides outside the posterior pole, predominantly in the temporal and peripheral retina. Quantitative parameters showed significant positive correlations with axial length (e.g., total area: R = 0.41, P < 0.001; peripheral area R3: R = 0.40, P < 0.001; total number: R = 0.43, P < 0.001). This AI-powered system provides an objective, standardized, and high-throughput tool for WWOP evaluation but should currently be considered a research tool requiring further validation. Nevertheless, it holds strong potential to enhance clinical screening and risk stratification in myopia management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.