ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2026
Mechanotransduction in glioma stem cell fate determination: from niche mechanics to therapeutic vulnerability and state plasticity.
Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM), the most aggressive primary brain malignancy, harbors glioma stem cells (GSCs) that drive tumor initiation, therapeutic resistance, and recurrence. While the biochemical regulation of GSCs through Notch, Wnt, and Hedgehog pathways is well established, accumulating evidence reveals that the physical and mechanical properties of the tumor microenvironment-including matrix stiffness, solid stress, viscoelasticity, and topographical architecture-constitute a fundamental yet underappreciated layer of GSC regulation. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of how mechanotransduction pathways regulate GSC fate decisions, including self-renewal, differentiation, migration, and drug resistance. We systematically characterize the mechanical properties of distinct GSC niches, delineate the key mechanosensors and signaling cascades-including integrins/FAK, CD44-hyaluronic acid, Piezo1 channels, and YAP/TAZ-Hippo signaling-that connect extracellular mechanics to intracellular fate decisions. Crucially, aligning with recent single-cell transcriptomic paradigms, we conceptualize GSCs not as a static cellular hierarchy, but as highly plastic populations transitioning among dynamic states (e.g., neural progenitor-like, mesenchymal-like). We examine how mechanical cues serve as profound biophysical drivers of this state plasticity, alongside the emerging roles of nuclear mechanotransduction and mechanical memory. We critically evaluate the discrepancy between 2D and 3D mechanical responses, consolidate the ongoing debate regarding GBM tissue stiffness, and assess the therapeutic potential of targeting mechanotransduction to eliminate GSCs. By integrating insights from mechanobiology, stem cell biology, neuro-oncology, and bioengineering, we propose the "mechano-stemness axis" as a conceptual framework positioning mechanical forces as critical modulators of GSC dynamic plasticity, and identify critical knowledge gaps requiring direct validation in patient-derived models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.