ArticleDrying technology2025
Room-Temperature Aerosol Dehydration of Green Fluorescent Protein.
Article in Drying technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid Room-Temperature Aerosol Dehydration (RTAD) is a novel, scalable drying technology for powderization and thermal stabilization of pharmaceutical drug products. Compared to conventional spray drying processes, typically using droplets of 10-200 micron in diameter generated by high-shear spraying, RTAD uses much smaller droplets with diameter 0.1 to 20 microns produced in modified liquid atomization processes. These fine droplets evaporate rapidly within 10-100 ms at room temperature conditions, thereby reducing drying-induced stresses for thermally sensitive biologics. In this study, we employed Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) as a model biological molecule to optimize the RTAD system design and process parameters. We experimentally investigated the effects of droplet size, multiphase flow patterns in the drying chamber, and usage of polysorbate 20 as a model surfactant on GFP fluorescence after drying and powder reconstitution. The experiments demonstrated that the presence of surfactant in the formulation significantly influenced GFP fluorescence intensity, especially for smaller droplets. The numerical studies using Computational Fluid Dynamics simulations revealed that the intensity of GFP fluorescence in the produced dry powders was dependent on the patterns of multiphase flow in the drying chamber. Non-axisymmetric flows and closed circulating streamlines near the drying gas inlet resulted in considerably longer particle residence times and subjected GFP molecules to excess stress that negatively impacted the GFP fluorescence intensity. Through iterative optimization of the chamber design, process parameters and feedstock formulation, we achieved recovery of the GFP fluorescence intensity that exceeded 96% in the obtained dry powders. This work establishes GFP as a sensitive model biologic and its fluorescence intensity as a powerful tool to rapidly assess process efficiency and the ability to preserve bioactivity after dehydration. The study has broad implications for the design and scale-up of drying technologies, which can potentially transform the production of dry powder biopharmaceuticals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.