ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Knowledge, attitudes and practices of smallholder dairy farmers on antimicrobial use in selected districts of Zambia: implications for antimicrobial stewardship.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The improper use of antibiotics in dairy farming contributes significantly to the development of antibiotic resistance (AMR), posing a global public health risk. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in dairy production can reduce the spread of AMR. Smallholder dairy farmers (SHDFs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are particularly critical stakeholders in this context, given their significant contribution to the dairy sector. Consequently, AMS in dairy production can reduce the spread of AMR. This study aimed to examine the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) related to antibiotic use (AMU) and AMR among SHDFs in selected districts of Zambia to guide AMS interventions in the given contexts. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a structured questionnaire administered to 360 SHDFs conveniently identified at Milk Collection Centers (MCCs) across six purposively selected districts of Southern and Lusaka provinces. Results: In total, 75.8% of respondents had poor overall KAP scores. While attitudes were positive toward the need to consult a veterinarian (99.2%), some practices were misaligned, including self-administration (38.6%), failure to observe withdrawal periods (24.2%) and selling (20%) and consuming milk (19.7%) from drug-treated animals. Whereas 42% could define AMR only 25.6% of participants knew the effects of misusing antibiotics. Good KAP was associated with level of education ( Conclusion: This study gave insights into the KAP among SHDFs regarding AMU and AMR with implications for AMS. Educational programmes that shape correct attitudes based on increased Knowledge are encouraged. Geographical disparities in KAP scores emphasize the need for targeted context-specific AMS interventions. Our findings also revealed that financial barriers undermined prudent antimicrobial use. Addressing these gaps through training, economic support, and district-focused One Health interventions is essential to strengthening AMS in Zambia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.