ReviewGlobal health & medicine2026
Proactive adoption of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in the operations of Japan's Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA): Current initiatives, governance, and future perspectives.
Review in Global health & medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) continues to face increasing operational demands stemming from growing regulatory complexity, expanding data volumes, and evolving scientific and societal expectations. In this context, the appropriate adoption of generative artificial intelligence has emerged as a potential approach for enhancing operational efficiency while reinforcing scientific rigor and accountability. This article describes the current status of generative artificial intelligence utilization at PMDA, outlines its governance framework, and discusses future perspectives for its sustainable application based on institutional experience, internal policy development, and planned/ongoing proof-of-concept activities conducted within PMDA. We summarize a phased implementation strategy that combines commercially available generative artificial intelligence tools for administrative support with the exploration of large language models in secure internal environments for scientifically specialized tasks. Central to this approach is a governance framework that emphasizes human-in-the-loop decision-making, staged evaluation, information governance, and staff capacity building. We also present practical use cases across information collection, analysis and evaluation, and dissemination activities to illustrate how generative artificial intelligence may support regulatory work without replacing human judgment. In conclusion, PMDA's experience suggests that proactive yet cautious adoption of generative artificial intelligence, grounded in robust governance and organizational learning, can improve productivity and enhance scientific capacity within regulatory authorities while maintaining public trust and institutional accountability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.