Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42368303›Full record

ReviewGlobal health & medicine2026

Proactive adoption of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in the operations of Japan's Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA): Current initiatives, governance, and future perspectives.

Kohei Amakasu, Junichi Kawana, Osamu Kotera, Tomoharu Numanyu, Akihiro Nakajima, Koichi Ishikawa, Yuka Kobayashi, Yoshiaki Uyama

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global health & medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kohei AmakasuOffice of Regulatory Science Coordination, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Tokyo, Japan.
Junichi KawanaOffice of Regulatory Science Coordination, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Tokyo, Japan.
Osamu KoteraOffice of Regulatory Science Coordination, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomoharu NumanyuOffice of New Drug I, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Tokyo, Japan.
Akihiro NakajimaOffice of Information Technology Promotion, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Tokyo, Japan.
Koichi IshikawaOffice of Information Technology Promotion, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuka KobayashiOffice of Planning and Operations, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiaki UyamaCenter for Regulatory Science, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) continues to face increasing operational demands stemming from growing regulatory complexity, expanding data volumes, and evolving scientific and societal expectations. In this context, the appropriate adoption of generative artificial intelligence has emerged as a potential approach for enhancing operational efficiency while reinforcing scientific rigor and accountability. This article describes the current status of generative artificial intelligence utilization at PMDA, outlines its governance framework, and discusses future perspectives for its sustainable application based on institutional experience, internal policy development, and planned/ongoing proof-of-concept activities conducted within PMDA. We summarize a phased implementation strategy that combines commercially available generative artificial intelligence tools for administrative support with the exploration of large language models in secure internal environments for scientifically specialized tasks. Central to this approach is a governance framework that emphasizes human-in-the-loop decision-making, staged evaluation, information governance, and staff capacity building. We also present practical use cases across information collection, analysis and evaluation, and dissemination activities to illustrate how generative artificial intelligence may support regulatory work without replacing human judgment. In conclusion, PMDA's experience suggests that proactive yet cautious adoption of generative artificial intelligence, grounded in robust governance and organizational learning, can improve productivity and enhance scientific capacity within regulatory authorities while maintaining public trust and institutional accountability.

Indexed as

generative artificial intelligenceoperational efficiencyregulatory science

Identifiers

PMID42368303
PMCPMC13306865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.