ReviewInternational journal of dentistry2026
Integration of Endodontic Services Into Preventive Oral Health Care: A Narrative Review.
Review in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integration of Endodontic Services Into Preventive Oral Health Care: A Narrative Review.International journal of dentistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The integration of endodontic services into preventive oral health care has become increasingly important as dental caries and pulpal pathologies remain major contributors to the global burden of oral disease. However, despite advances in preventive dentistry, gaps persist in the early identification and management of pulpal disease within primary care systems. Integrating endodontic services may enhance early diagnosis, timely intervention, and long-term tooth preservation. Methods: A narrative review of published literature was conducted to examine current models, strategies, and evidence related to integrating endodontic care within preventive oral health frameworks. Key databases and professional organizational documents were reviewed to identify themes including service delivery models, workforce considerations, recent technological advances, barriers, and policy directions. Methodological rigor was enhanced using structured narrative review approaches and guided thematic synthesis. Results: Evidence indicates that integration enhances continuity of care, improves access to early pulp therapy, and reduces disease progression. Successful models include referral-based coordination, colocation of care, and deployment of practitioners with enhanced endodontic skills. Technological developments such as digital diagnostics, artificial intelligence, and minimally invasive endodontic techniques further support integration. However, barriers such as fragmented health systems, limited workforce capacity, inconsistent funding, and inadequate training persist. Importantly, the current evidence base remains heterogeneous, with limited long-term outcome data and variability in implementation across health systems. Policy frameworks and interprofessional collaboration are essential to overcoming these challenges. Conclusion: Integrating endodontic services into preventive oral health systems is feasible and beneficial, offering improved patient outcomes and stronger primary care delivery. Adoption of standardized referral pathways, workforce development, digital infrastructure, and supportive policies can facilitate broader implementation. Future research should prioritize cost-effectiveness analyses, standardized outcome measures, and evaluation of long-term clinical impact to support scalable integration models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.