ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Barriers and opportunities to improve fluid balance recognition and reduction: a qualitative study.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Excess cumulative fluid balance is a common complication impacting critically ill pediatric patients that is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, there are inconsistent practices in recognizing and reducing excess fluid balance. Purpose: Assess contextual factors that inform fluid-based practices across four pediatric intensive care units. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews across 4 PICUs from August to October 2025. Through an iterative process informed by prior survey data, we followed the established implementation science Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance/Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model framework to develop an interview guide. Questions explored fluid balance recognition and reduction. Participants were recruited using purposive sampling via email recruitment. We used Rapid Assessment Procedures with two independent coders. Thematic saturation was reached within the first round of interviews. Results: We performed thirty-eight interviews comprised of nurses ( Discussion: These themes highlight the need for accurate data reporting, shifts in emphasis of fluid management, and cultural/systemic changes. We theorize that these suboptimal approaches to fluid balance management could inform clinical decision support tools, research priorities, and quality improvement initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.