ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2026
What's that noise-tackling sound pollution in the NICU: a systematic review.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Preterm infants are highly susceptible to environmental influences due to the immaturity of their sensory and neurological systems. In neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), ambient noise frequently exceeds recommended thresholds and may interfere with auditory and neurodevelopmental maturation. During a critical period of sensory refinement, infants are exposed to unpredictable, high-intensity soundscapes generated by alarms, respiratory devices, and staff activity, contrasting sharply with the regulated acoustic environment of the womb. Aim: This systematic review aimed to identify, describe, and categorize noise sources in the NICU and to examine their potential impact on preterm infants. Method: A systematic search across six major databases [MEDLINE, Embase, APA Psychinfo, CINHAL, Scopus, Web of Science (WOS); 2000-2026] identified studies reporting 24-h noise levels, day-night variation, and differences between incubator-internal and external sound. Eligible studies were synthesized and visualized using forest, strip, and dot plots, interpreted relative to American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommendations. Result: From 113 included studies, most reported sound levels substantially above recommended limits. Alarms, staff conversations, and incubator-associated equipment were consistently identified as major contributors. Respiratory support devices produced the highest internal noise levels, at times exceeding overall NICU ambient noise. Interventions such as staff training, behavioral adjustments, and environmental modifications yielded short-term improvements but rarely produced sustained reductions. Conclusion: NICU noise is a modifiable risk factor with significant developmental implications. Future strategies should integrate environmental design, technological innovation, and infant-focused interventions at the incubator-device interface to create safer, developmentally supportive acoustic conditions. Evidence also suggests that excessive shielding may reduce meaningful auditory input, raising concerns about potential auditory deprivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.