ArticleArXiv2026
Accuracy, Repeatability, and Reproducibility of a Radiographic Technique to Assess Spinal Cord Stimulation Lead Position: A Validation Study.
Article in ArXiv, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spinal cord stimulation with implantable leads is a valuable therapy used to treat a variety of chronic pain conditions. However, lead migration is a common complication causing loss of efficacy. Previous reports have characterized lead migration using radiographs, but methods are not consistent and lack rigorous validation. The purpose of this study was to develop a technique to perform radiographic measurements of the position of epidural spinal cord leads within the lumbosacral spinal canal and establish its accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility. Computed tomography scans were acquired from three clinical trial participants implanted percutaneously with two eight-contact cylindrical leads; from these, electrode positions were established using three-dimensional measurements, and digitally reconstructed radiographs were created. Two operators applied a digitization and measurement protocol for each lead. Bland-Altman plots were created to determine smallest detectable change, and a gage repeatability and reproducibility analysis was performed. Smallest detectable change was found to be less than the distance between adjacent electrodes and variability introduced by repeatability and reproducibility was less than 10% of the total study variability. We conclude that the method developed to measure lead electrode position has sufficient accuracy and acceptable repeatability and reproducibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42368253PMC13308447What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.