Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42368253›Full record

ArticleArXiv2026

Accuracy, Repeatability, and Reproducibility of a Radiographic Technique to Assess Spinal Cord Stimulation Lead Position: A Validation Study.

Andrew Thoreson, Katrina Fernandez, Cesar Lopez, Margaux Linde, Mark A Bendel, Peter Grahn, Kristin D Zhao

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrew ThoresonAssistive and Restorative Technology Laboratory, Rehabilitation Medicine Research Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Katrina FernandezAssistive and Restorative Technology Laboratory, Rehabilitation Medicine Research Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Cesar LopezAssistive and Restorative Technology Laboratory, Rehabilitation Medicine Research Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Margaux LindeAssistive and Restorative Technology Laboratory, Rehabilitation Medicine Research Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mark A BendelDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Peter GrahnAssistive and Restorative Technology Laboratory, Rehabilitation Medicine Research Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Kristin D ZhaoAssistive and Restorative Technology Laboratory, Rehabilitation Medicine Research Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

Elucidating spinal sensorimotor network components that underlie recovery of motor functions via lumbosacral epidural electrical stimulation in humans with spinal cord injuryR01NS115877 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI GRAHN, PETER JONAS · 2020 to 2024
$3.0M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS115877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord stimulation with implantable leads is a valuable therapy used to treat a variety of chronic pain conditions. However, lead migration is a common complication causing loss of efficacy. Previous reports have characterized lead migration using radiographs, but methods are not consistent and lack rigorous validation. The purpose of this study was to develop a technique to perform radiographic measurements of the position of epidural spinal cord leads within the lumbosacral spinal canal and establish its accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility. Computed tomography scans were acquired from three clinical trial participants implanted percutaneously with two eight-contact cylindrical leads; from these, electrode positions were established using three-dimensional measurements, and digitally reconstructed radiographs were created. Two operators applied a digitization and measurement protocol for each lead. Bland-Altman plots were created to determine smallest detectable change, and a gage repeatability and reproducibility analysis was performed. Smallest detectable change was found to be less than the distance between adjacent electrodes and variability introduced by repeatability and reproducibility was less than 10% of the total study variability. We conclude that the method developed to measure lead electrode position has sufficient accuracy and acceptable repeatability and reproducibility.

Indexed as

leadmigrationneuromodulationpercutaneousradiographspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID42368253
PMCPMC13308447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.