Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42368252›Full record

ArticleArXiv2026

PyPeakRankR: Reproducible Peak-Level Feature Extraction for Regulatory Element Ranking.

Saroja Somasundaram, Nelson J Johansen, Trygve E Bakken, Jeremy A Miller

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saroja SomasundaramAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Nelson J JohansenAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Trygve E BakkenAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jeremy A MillerAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Functionally guided adult whole brain cell atlas in human and NHPUM1MH130981 · NIMH · ALLEN INSTITUTE · PI Ed Lein, Hongkui Zeng · 2022 to 2026
$91.9M
NIMH NIH HHS UM1 MH130981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput chromatin accessibility assays such as ATAC-seq generate thousands of candidate regulatory elements (peaks), yet no standardized tool exists for assembling the diverse quantitative features needed to prioritize peaks for functional validation. Here we present PyPeakRankR, an open-source Python package that extracts peak-level features, namely BigWig signal summaries, GC content, PhyloP conservation scores, distribution moments (kurtosis, skewness, bimodality), and cell-type specificity rankings, into a single reproducible peak by feature matrix stored as a tab-separated values (TSV) file. PyPeakRankR separates deterministic feature extraction from downstream ranking, enabling transparent benchmarking of prioritization strategies on the same upstream data. The package provides both a command-line interface and a matching Python API, supports cross-assembly scoring via liftOver, and runs in minutes on thousands of peaks. PyPeakRankR was validated in the Brain Initiative Cell Census Network (BICCN) community challenge, where its predecessor PeakRankR ranked among the top 3 of 16 methods for cell-type-specific enhancer prediction. In a recent basal ganglia study, PyPeakRankR was used within the Cross-species Enhancer Ranking Pipeline (CERP) to identify enhancer-AAV tools achieving greater than 70% on-target specificity across cell types. PyPeakRankR is freely available under the MIT license at https://github.com/AllenInstitute/PeakRankR/tree/python-package.

Indexed as

ATAC-seqbioinformaticsenhancergenomicspeak rankingPythonregulatory elements

Identifiers

PMID42368252
PMCPMC13308449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.