ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2026
Protected complex high-risk indicated percutaneous coronary intervention in severe left ventricular dysfunction: an illustrative case highlighting patient selection, procedural planning, execution, and device management.
Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction (ILVD) is the leading cause of heart failure and is commonly encountered in cardiac catheterization laboratories. Patients presenting with ILVD are typically older and often have complex coronary anatomy, making revascularization challenging. Although coronary artery bypass grafting improves long-term survival in patients with ILVD compared with medical therapy, the benefit emerges only after a decade and appears limited to younger patients, leaving many older, frail, or comorbid individuals at untenable risk. Such patients are frequently considered for complex high-risk indicated percutaneous coronary intervention (CHIP), where the primary determinant of procedural risk is intra-procedural haemodynamic instability due to limited ventricular reserve and anticipated prolonged ischaemia. Registry data underscore the heightened risk in patients with multiple CHIP features, including ejection fraction ≤30%, left main or multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention, and extensive calcification. Here, temporary mechanical circulatory support has emerged as a strategy to mitigate haemodynamic compromise during CHIP procedures. Although trial data have demonstrated no early benefit with the intra-aortic balloon pump, long-term follow-up suggests improved survival. Alternatively, microaxial flow pumps, such as Impella™, can offer robust haemodynamic support and a reduction in late major adverse events. Although results from the ongoing randomized clinical trials with Impella are pending, careful Heart Team evaluation and procedural planning remain essential to ensure the best possible patient outcomes. Here, we illustrate a structured approach to Impella-supported CHIP in an elderly patient with the presence of ILVD, severely impaired ventricular reserve, and heavily calcified multivessel disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.