ArticleHealth and technology2026
Detecting changes in health and daily activities using environmental and electricity sensors and machine learning.
Article in Health and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this feasibility study was to test whether changes in the indoor environment and electricity usage can be used to detect changes in occupant activities that reflect changes in health. Methods: Temperature, relative humidity, carbon dioxide and electrical current were measured over 14+ months in 36 single-occupant homes. Data regarding health and household activities were collected via frequent optional surveys. Characteristics were extracted from the sensor data, including descriptive statistics, timings of peaks and troughs, frequency, deviations from average and modelled values (long short-term memory neural network). Machine learning was used to map these characteristics to occupant responses about health and activities, using a multilayer regressor neural network. Models were trained using all participant data together and separately on data from individual participants. Results: Detection of an existing health condition being worse than normal gave a balanced accuracy of 62%, with 95% of the models having performance above chance. For individual participants, highest performance for detecting worse health was 75% balanced accuracy. Models trained on this participant's data generally gave the highest performance detecting specific reasons for worse health, with 80% for an existing health condition, 87% for mental health, and 84% for physical pain. Conclusions: Overall, the results from this feasibility study provide evidence that data from environmental and electrical-power sensors could be useful in monitoring health and supporting independent living at home. When indicators of worsening health are detected, interventions could be made, providing external support from service providers, or prompting behavioural change, in advance of the issue worsening. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12553-026-01082-x.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.