Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42368159›Full record

ReviewACS omega2026

Microbial-Based Agrochemicals: Cell-in and Cell-free Formulations, Application, and Production via Agricultural Byproducts for a Circular Economy.

Victor Hugo Buttrós, Clara Resende de Souza Castro, Vinícius de Abreu D'Ávilla, Nayara Aparecida Santos Ribeiro, Luciana Silva Ribeiro, Fernanda Luiza Mendes Baldez, Maria Letícia de Melo Chagas, Caroline Dambroz, Leandro Israel Silva, Tatiana Cardoso E Bufalo and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Victor Hugo ButtrósSoil Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 90040-060, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8879-6864
Clara Resende de Souza CastroDepartment of Biology, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras 37200-000, Brazil.
Vinícius de Abreu D'ÁvillaDepartment of Earth and Agricultural Sciences, Minas Gerais State University, Passos, Minas Gerais 37900-106, Brazil.
Nayara Aparecida Santos RibeiroDepartment of Biology, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras 37200-000, Brazil.
Luciana Silva RibeiroInstitute of Health and Animal Production, Federal Rural University of Amazonas, Belém 66077-530, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1052-9752
Fernanda Luiza Mendes BaldezDepartment of Biology, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras 37200-000, Brazil.
Maria Letícia de Melo ChagasDepartment of Biology, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras 37200-000, Brazil.
Caroline DambrozDepartment of Agriculture, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras 37200-000, Brazil.
Leandro Israel SilvaDepartment of Biology, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras 37200-000, Brazil.
Tatiana Cardoso E BufaloDepartment of Physics, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras 37200-000, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6312-8322
Joyce DóriaDepartment of Agriculture, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras 37200-000, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7727-5016

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern agriculture relies on synthetic agrochemicals, but regulatory pressure, environmental costs, and supply chain volatility are accelerating interest in microbial-based agrochemicals (MBAs) as renewable inputs for sustainable intensification. This review frames MBAs through a circular economy lens, highlighting agricultural byproducts as fermentation feedstocks and formulation carriers to reduce cost and footprint while enabling scale-up. We compare cell-in products, which require viable microorganisms to survive processing, storage, and field stresses and to establish in target niches, versus cell-free products, which depend on maintaining the activity and residence time of metabolites, enzymes, and extracts despite degradation, dilution, and adsorption. We summarize submerged and solid-state fermentation and downstream routes to biomass or clarified bioactive fractions and link formulation families (liquids, solids, granules, encapsulated/controlled-release, immobilized) to delivery routes (seed, soil, foliar, fertigation). We highlight critical quality attributes, release criteria, and validation metrics connecting process control to field performance, then outline barriers (feedstock heterogeneity, batch variability, compatibility, context dependence) and priorities for standardization, mechanism-based stabilization/controlled release, and multienvironment validation.

Identifiers

PMID42368159
PMCPMC13295060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.