Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42368039›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in nursing : JRN2026

Personal fulfilment, sustainable working conditions and flexible employment prospects as resources for nurses' well-being at work: a qualitative study.

Jenni Mäntynen, Marja Hult, Terhi Saaranen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in nursing : JRN, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jenni MäntynenPhD Student, Department of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2834-4229
Marja HultUniversity Lecturer, Docent, PhD, Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2020-5914
Terhi SaaranenProfessor, Department of Nursing Science and Health Pedagogy, University of Eastern Finland, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nurse shortages are intensified by retirement and early career exits. Well-being at work is critical for retention, yet research has primarily focused on burdensome factors at work: stress and burnout. Positive aspects of well-being and the role of employment relationships remain underexplored. Aim: To describe nurses' experiences of resources that promote well-being at work. Methods: A qualitative interview study was conducted in Finland in 2021. Seventeen nurses participated in individual interviews, and data were analysed using content analysis. Results: Resources enhancing well-being at work were grouped into four main categories: Professional fulfilment and growth, Supportive and sustainable working conditions, Organisational resources and culture and Employment flexibility. These categories included 11 subcategories, reflecting factors such as opportunities for career advancement, moderate workload, benefits and flexible employment contracts. Conclusions: Nurses' well-being at work can be supported at individual, working community and organisational levels. Policies should promote flexible employment relationships, enable professional development and strengthen organisational practices that foster well-being. Legislative frameworks and organisational strategies are essential to improve retention and address workforce sustainability in nursing.

Indexed as

employment relationshipshealth care organisationsnursewell-being at workworking community

Identifiers

PMID42368039
PMCPMC13309349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.