ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Simultaneous regeneration of skin and bone in full-thickness cranial composite defects.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traumatic cranial defects often involve concurrent loss of soft and hard tissues and can progress to chronic defects due to delayed healing associated with infection or other co-morbidities. Despite autologous reconstruction remaining the clinical standard, it requires staged procedures using heterogeneous tissues, increasing operative time, costs, and surgical risks. Moreover, current tissue engineering approaches focus on single tissues or acute tissue defect models, limiting their clinical applications. Herein, we describe an acellular, material-driven 3D-printed composite scaffold designed to regenerate both bone and skin within composite cranial defects. The scaffold integrates controlled copper ion release from both organic and inorganic components with 3D-printed citrate polymer and citrate polymer-ceramic composites. Integrated thermoresponsive citrate-based hydrogels further enable spatially defined dermoconductive and osteoconductive properties, supporting a one-step surgical approach. At 12 weeks post-implantation, our scaffold enhanced keratinocyte organization, collagen deposition, and defect coverage with mature bone, achieving histological outcomes comparable to autografts. Furthermore, the system suppressed bacterial burden. Thus, this acellular platform represents a clinically promising synchronized strategy to address the complex demands of traumatic craniofacial composite defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.