Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42367746›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2026

A Unified Neural Time Course for Words, Phrases, and Sentences: MEG Evidence from Parallel Presentation.

Nigel Flower, Liina Pylkkänen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nigel FlowerDepartment of Linguistics, New York University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9961-0497
Liina PylkkänenDepartment of Linguistics, New York University, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent behavioral and neural research on reading shows that humans can extract syntactic structure from short sentences within a fraction of a second-faster than many estimates for recognizing the meaning of a single word. This challenges a core assumption of many language processing models-that combinatory operations depend on prior lexical access. Furthermore, studies using parallel presentation of full sentences have revealed electrophysiological responses remarkably similar to those well established for single words. This raises the question of whether words, phrases, and sentences all move through the same processing stages, regardless of syntactic complexity. Using magnetoencephalography, we examined how single words, phrases, and sentences are processed when all visual information is available at once. Across all three levels, we observed highly similar waveform dynamics, with early responses reflecting bottom-up detection of form, followed by activity in the left anterior and posterior temporal cortices and ventromedial prefrontal cortex consistent with combinatory processing. Of these regions, the left anterior temporal lobe showed effects of bigram frequency suggestive of serial left-to-right dynamics. Together, these results support a Global-to-Sequential Assembly model in which the brain first detects the global form of the stimulus in a snapshot-like manner and then probes its combinatory properties through partially serial processes.

Indexed as

combinatory processingLATLMEGMTGparallel presentation

Identifiers

PMID42367746
PMCPMC13293727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.