Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42367731›Full record

ArticleSage open aging

Sustaining the Long-Term Care Workforce: An Appreciative Inquiry into the Relational and Generative Factors Driving Staff Retention.

Joey Oi Yee Wong, Karen Lok Yi Wong, Yong Zhao, Christine Meng, Margaret Lin, Nathan A Boucher, Lillian Hung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sage open aging. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joey Oi Yee WongUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2181-6255
Karen Lok Yi WongChinese University of Hong Kong, The People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4079-9123
Yong ZhaoUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5074-1346
Christine MengUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6936-9138
Margaret LinUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Nathan A BoucherSanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5732-1927
Lillian HungUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7916-2939

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Literature often explores turnover, burnout, and inadequate support of long-term care (LTC) workforces, and their negative impact on staff retention and care delivery. However, current evidence on positive core elements that retain staff is limited and does not adequately capture multidisciplinary staff perspectives. This study uses the appreciative inquiry approach with multidisciplinary staff in an urban LTC home in Canada to examine positive drivers of staff retention. Reflexive thematic analysis identified three retention drivers: (1) being valued as a whole person rather than solely as a worker, (2) experiencing relational belonging through team cohesion and family-like connections with residents and colleagues, and (3) working within a supportive organizational environment that fosters flexibility, autonomy, and career development. These findings reveal that workforce sustainability extends beyond wages and workload to include relational, cultural, and identity-affirming dimensions of work. We propose the C.A.R.E. model based on our findings: Cultivate community, Amplify the positive core, ensure Resources for growth and Inclusivity, and Empower LTC workforce by supporting equity and diverse voices. The path to a sustainable LTC system is to nurture an environment that inspires staff to stay; we call for more research on how to achieve this with LTC communities.

Indexed as

diversityinclusionnursing homesrelationalitystrength-based

Identifiers

PMID42367731
PMCPMC13305620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.