ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
Rethinking tracheostomy care: cuffless tubes for patients with aspiration.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Guidelines do not recommend cuffless tracheostomy tubes in patients at risk of aspiration, although there is no evidence supporting the protective effect of cuffed tubes against aspiration or pneumonia. The Zihlschlacht Neurological Rehabilitation Clinic has routinely implemented early transition to cuffless tubes to support rehabilitation, facilitate communication and improve quality of life. This study evaluates the impact of this approach on tracheostomy management and pneumonia rates. Methods: Retrospective analysis included 124 non-ventilated, tracheostomized neurological patients admitted between January 2019 and December 2022. Outcomes were pneumonia, aspiration, secretion burden, and tolerance of speaking valves or decannulation caps. Results: Of the 124 patients, 119 were admitted with cuffed tubes. Pneumonia was documented in 112 patients and aspiration in 77. All patients were switched to cuffless tubes within seven days, including those with severe aspiration. After conversion to cuffless tubes, suspected aspiration decreased from 29 to 13 and confirmed aspiration from 48 to 42 cases, totaling 55, while pneumonia fell to 14. Most patients tolerated speaking valves or decannulation caps immediately, required less suctioning, and showed a marked reduction in secretions. Discussion: Early conversion to cuffless tubes did not increase aspiration pneumonia and was associated with improved secretion management and easier airway care. These findings challenge the presumed protective role of cuffed tubes and support the feasibility of early cuffless use in neurological rehabilitation. Aspiration risk alone should not preclude early cuffless management. Prospective studies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.