ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
The collaboration of RTs and SLPs in German centers for weaning from mechanical ventilation in neurological and neurosurgical early rehabilitation - results from an online survey.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Weaning in early neurological-neurosurgical rehabilitation (ENNR) is an interdisciplinary process performed by physician-led multidisciplinary teams including speech language pathologists (SLP) and in an increasing number of institutions also respiratory therapists (RT). Objective: This study analyzes the role, the competencies, the collaboration and their mutual perception of SLPs and RTs involved in ENNR Weaning. Methods: Two profession-specific web-based surveys (43 items each) were developed to assess work experience, interventions in tracheostomy, communication, secretion and dysphagia management and perceived therapists' role within the multidisciplinary team. Surveys were distributed to ENNR units and center. Results: Twenty-seven SLPs and sixteen RTs completed the surveys. SLPs reported more ENNR-specific experience, whereas RTs had more overall clinical experience. Both professions rated their own recommendations-regarding tracheostomy tube selection, timing of cuff deflation, choice of communication methods, and secretion-management strategies-as more important than those of the other group. Both agreed that dysphagia assessment is primarily an SLP responsibility. However, they differed on whether all patients should undergo instrumental examinations such as FEES or tracheoscopy, despite broad agreement on the objectives of these procedures. Both professions regularly trained other team members in tracheostomy management, dysphagia, weaning, and FEES, underscoring their educational roles within the team. Conclusion: As RTs become more involved in ENNR weaning, enhanced interprofessional education is necessary, particularly regarding communication-focused interventions. Clear job descriptions and SOPs should define shared objectives, procedures, and responsibilities. Training should emphasize above-cuff vocalization, in-line speaking valves (e.g., Passy Muir Valve), and appropriate timing of FEES and tracheoscopy. A targeted educational program for both professions-and for the broader weaning team-may support more efficient weaning, improved communication and swallowing, and better overall patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.