ArticleEULAR rheumatology open2025
Patients' perspectives of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis within the context of a clinical trial.
Article in EULAR rheumatology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04157348 (A Randomised, Double-blind, Active-controlled 52-week Study With an Open-label Extension to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Benralizumab Compared to Mepolizumab in the Treatment of Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomised, Double-blind, Active-controlled 52-week Study With an Open-label Extension to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Benralizumab Compared to Mepolizumab in the Treatment of Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis (EGPA) in Patients Receiving Standard of Care Therapy (MANDARA Study)
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a complex, multisystem form of vasculitis. MANDARA (NCT04157348) was a phase 3 clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of benralizumab versus mepolizumab, in addition to standard of care, for relapsing/refractory EGPA. This qualitative interview substudy explored study participants' experiences with EGPA and their participation in the trial. Methods: Thirty-eight patients from 5 countries participating in MANDARA opted into a longitudinal qualitative substudy, which comprised two 60-minute, semistructured, one-to-one telephone interviews conducted by trained interviewers between December 2019 and June 2023. Topics discussed included motivation to join the trial, time since diagnosis, symptoms, and impacts of EGPA and their degree of 'bothersomeness' and 'disturbance'. Results: The desire to stop or reduce the use of oral glucocorticoids was the most frequently mentioned motivation for, and expectation of, participation in the trial. Comparison of interviews between the 2 time points suggested patients experienced reductions in the number and impact of EGPA-related symptoms and bothersomeness and/or disturbance ratings. Most improved symptoms included difficulty breathing, nasal congestion/discharge, and fatigue, and most improved impacts included ability to exercise, quality/quantity of sleep, and ability to engage in social activities. Conclusions: This study provides insights regarding patients' perspectives of EGPA and their perceptions and experiences associated with receiving an anti-interleukin-5/receptor therapy. These findings highlight the need for effective treatments that allow patients to reduce their use of oral glucocorticoids and the importance of assessing patient experiences when gauging treatment efficacy in EGPA.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.