ArticleEULAR rheumatology open2025
Qualitative study to explore self-management strategies in severe systemic lupus erythematosus.
Article in EULAR rheumatology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Self-management in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an emerging concept aimed at empowering individuals in their disease journey. However, qualitative exploration of self-management strategies in severe SLE is limited. This study aimed to describe self-management strategies used by individuals with severe SLE to inform educational initiatives. Methods: This is a descriptive qualitative study involving focus groups of participants with severe SLE (high disease activity status) recruited from the Australian Lupus Registry and Biobank. Data were thematically analysed using inductive and deductive techniques. Results: Three focus groups were conducted involving 14 participants, with a median age of 39.5 years. Six key themes were identified: emotional and psychological coping, physical activity management, dietary modifications, support systems, personalisation of treatment, and barriers to health care. Emotional and psychological coping strategies were critical for managing SLE uncertainties, including maintaining a positive outlook, accepting the diagnosis, and leveraging social support. Physical activity, although challenging, was essential, with participants advocating for gentle, consistent exercise balanced with rest. Dietary adjustments, such as reducing processed foods and increasing whole foods, were widely adopted for symptom control. Support systems, particularly advocacy groups, reduced isolation and provided practical advice. Notably, engagement with health management tools (eg, symptom trackers and digital applications) was absent, indicating a gap in awareness or accessibility. Limited discussion of other health events, such as infections, surgeries, or vaccinations, highlighted additional areas requiring attention. Conclusions: This study provides insights into the self-management strategies of individuals with severe SLE and underscores the need for tailored education and tools to enhance disease management across the lifespan.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.