ArticleBMJ neurology open2026
Correlation of Gray-to-White matter ratio on Non-Contrast CT with neurological outcome in Post-Cardiac arrest syndrome.
Article in BMJ neurology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Post-cardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS) is a major cause of mortality and neurological disability. Early prognostication is essential for clinical decision-making, but variability in interpretation of Non-Contrast CT (NCCT)) Gray to White Matter Ratio (GWR) measurement techniques limits its clinical standardisation. This study evaluated the association between the Gray-to-White Matter Ratio (GWR) on early non-contrast CT (NCCT) and 6 -month neurological outcomes, and compared manual versus automated GWR measurements. Methodology: A retrospective cohort of 120 patients who are comatose with PCAS patients with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was analysed. NCCT scans (6-24 hours post-ROSC) were used to calculate GWR across basal ganglia, supratentorial cortex, and cerebellum using both manual and automated methods. Outcomes were classified using the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC). Prognostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and multivariable modelling was performed using Firth logistic regression. Results: Higher GWR values were significantly associated with favourable neurological outcomes across all regions and measurement methods (p<0.001). Automated global GWR demonstrated the highest prognostic accuracy (AUCarea under the curve=0.869; sensitivity 84.2%, specificity 84.1%) and was an independent predictor of poor outcome. Manual measurements showed moderate-to-good inter-rater reliability. Conclusion: GWR is a robust prognostic biomarker for neuroprognostication after cardiac arrest. Automated GWR measurement improves reproducibility and supports the standardisation of imaging-based prognostic assessment, with potential implications for clinical decision-making in post-cardiac arrest care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.