ArticleBMJ neurology open2026
Working years lost in people with epilepsy according to underlying aetiology: a population-based cohort study.
Article in BMJ neurology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We quantify the loss of working years for people with epilepsy according to underlying aetiology and compare to the general population. Methods: This population-based cohort study included all individuals aged 18-65 years living in Denmark from 1995 to 2018. Using nationwide registers from 1977 onward, we identified people with epilepsy and grouped them by presumed aetiology (secondary: infection, perinatal insult, congenital malformation, brain tumour, traumatic brain injury, stroke or unknown) and obtained annual data on primary income source during 1995-2020. The main outcome was working years lost comparing people with epilepsy to the general population, reflecting losses of working life from permanent (death, disability pension, early retirement) and temporary (unemployment, sick leave) factors. Results: The study included 5 466 144 individuals, with 48 223 (0.9%) having epilepsy of unknown aetiology and 26 754 (0.5%) with secondary epilepsy. Compared with the general population, post-traumatic epilepsy was associated with the greatest average loss of working life (10.2 years, 95% CI 9.9 to 10.4), whereas brain tumour-related epilepsy was associated with a reduction of 9.1 years (95% CI 8.8 to 9.4) and post-stroke epilepsy with a reduction of 6.6 years (95% CI 6.4 to 6.8). Epilepsy of unknown aetiology was associated with a 5.4-year loss (95% CI 5.2 to 5.5). Across all epilepsy types, most reductions in working life resulted from higher rates of disability pension and premature death. Conclusions: Epilepsy, especially when secondary to an underlying brain insult, was associated with significant loss of working life from both disability and premature death. More support is needed to help people with epilepsy secure and retain employment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.