ArticleEULAR rheumatology open2025
Differentiation of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) with back pain from back pain without DISH-clinical hints.
Article in EULAR rheumatology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) is characterised by an exuberant new bone formation involving the entire skeleton and predominantly the spine. Clinical manifestations and symptoms that differentiate DISH from other chronic noninflammatory musculoskeletal diseases are still not well-described. This study aimed to compare the clinical presentation of patients diagnosed with back pain and the diagnosis of DISH vs those without DISH. Methods: Data on demographics, musculoskeletal symptoms and clinical examinations were retrieved from a database of 92 clinically symptomatic patients previously diagnosed with DISH and 41 patients with back pain, without concomitant DISH (non-DISH group). Differences between those measures were analysed. Results: Sex and age distributions were comparable between patients DISH and non-DISH. Chest expansion (CE) was smaller in DISH vs non-DISH (2.1 ± 1.2 cm vs 3.3 ± 1.3 cm, Conclusions: In comparison to non-DISH patients with back pain, the combination of high BMI, type 2 diabetes mellitus, small CE and high OW are highly suggestive for DISH patients symptomatic for back pain. Future studies of these measures are warranted in larger cohorts of patients and with DISH patients in various levels of evolvement.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.