ArticleCureus2026
Comparison of Thoracic Segmental Spinal Anesthesia Using Isobaric Levobupivacaine With Fentanyl Versus Dexmedetomidine in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThoracic segmental spinal anesthesia is increasingly used as an alternative to general anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy because of its potential benefits in providing effective intraoperative anesthesia and improved postoperative recovery. The present study aimed to compare the hemodynamic effects, block characteristics, and postoperative analgesia effects of isobaric levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl versus dexmedetomidine in thoracic segmental spinal anesthesia. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this prospective comparative study, 60 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were divided into two groups of 30 each. Levobupivacaine was administered intrathecally with fentanyl (25 µg) in one group and levobupivacaine and dexmedetomidine (5 µg) in the other. Hemodynamic parameters, duration of analgesia, features of sensory and motor block, and side effects were recorded. The Chi-square/Fisher's exact test and the independent samples t-test were used for statistical analysis. A statistically significant p-value is one that is less than 0.05.
resultsBaseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. The onset of sensory block was significantly faster in the fentanyl group (3.46 ± 1.09 min) compared to the dexmedetomidine group (3.96 ± 0.77 min, p = 0.045). However, the duration of sensory block (190.43 ± 8.48 vs. 157.76 ± 16.31 min, p < 0.001) and duration of analgesia (279.43 ± 30.49 vs. 183.03 ± 20.87 min, p < 0.001) were significantly longer in the dexmedetomidine group. Hemodynamic parameters remained stable in both groups, although dexmedetomidine was associated with greater reductions in heart rate and blood pressure during the early intraoperative period. The incidence of adverse effects was comparable, with no cases of postoperative nausea and vomiting observed.
conclusionDexmedetomidine demonstrated superior efficacy as an intrathecal adjuvant by significantly prolonging sensory blockade and postoperative analgesia compared to fentanyl, albeit with a modest increase in manageable hemodynamic effects. These findings support its preferential use in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, where prolonged pain relief and stable intraoperative conditions are desired.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.