ReviewCureus2026
Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Ablation of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Toward Precision Diagnosis, Risk Stratification, and Personalized Therapy.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are increasingly detected at an early stage because of the wider use of cross-sectional imaging and endoscopic ultrasound. Their management remains challenging, particularly for small functioning tumors and selected non-functioning lesions, where the risks of pancreatic surgery must be balanced against tumor biology, symptoms, progression risk, and patient preference. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided ablation, particularly radiofrequency ablation, has emerged as a minimally invasive, organ-preserving option for carefully selected patients with small pNETs, especially insulinomas and low-risk non-functioning lesions. However, current evidence is limited by small cohorts, heterogeneous techniques, variable follow-up protocols, and uncertainty regarding long-term oncological outcomes. Artificial intelligence (AI) may enhance this evolving field by supporting EUS-based lesion detection, characterization, grading prediction, risk stratification, patient selection, procedural planning, and post-ablation surveillance. AI-assisted models using EUS images, radiomics, pathology, and multimodal clinical data may help identify patients most likely to benefit from ablation while avoiding inappropriate local therapy in biologically aggressive disease. This review summarizes the current role of EUS-guided ablation for pNETs and explores the emerging potential of AI to support precision diagnosis, individualized risk assessment, and personalized minimally invasive therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.