ArticleCureus2026
Reverse Sural Flap for Reconstruction of a Distal Leg Soft-Tissue Defect Following Dog Bite Injury: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dog bites are a frequent cause of extremity trauma and pose a substantial risk of infection and complications, particularly when bone exposure is present. We present the case of a 58-year-old male with no comorbidities who arrived at the emergency department after being attacked by a dog while cycling, sustaining multiple bites to the left lower extremity and right forearm. On physical examination, the patient exhibited complex wounds measuring up to 10 × 5 cm, with muscular and tibial bone exposure in the left leg but no associated fracture, and additional forearm lesions with muscle exposure but preserved tendon and neurovascular structures. Hemodynamic parameters were stable, while laboratory tests revealed marked leukocytosis (30,000/µL). The patient underwent urgent surgical irrigation, radical debridement, partial wound closure, and empiric intravenous antibiotic therapy on the day of admission. Due to persistent tibial bone exposure, definitive reconstruction with a distally based reverse sural flap was performed five days later, following serial wound care and infection control. The postoperative course was uneventful, with complete flap viability and 95% graft take by postoperative day seven, enabling discharge with oral antibiotics and local wound care. This case underscores the critical importance of prompt surgical and multidisciplinary management in complex dog bite injuries and further supports the reverse sural flap as a reliable, reproducible, and effective reconstructive option for coverage of distal leg defects with bone exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.