ArticleCureus2026
Forensic Analysis of Decapitation in an Agricultural Worker: A Case Report on Farm Tractor-Related Fatality.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The agricultural sector relies heavily on farm workers who operate tractors and other associated heavy machinery, mostly attached to the vehicle itself. With that in mind, they are at high risk of occupational and road traffic-related fatalities. Decapitation resulting from these accidents is an exceptionally rare outcome. A 61-year-old male was found decapitated on a farm field he was working at, next to a running farm tractor. The body was delivered with a decapitated head, of which the spinal cord was striking through. Also, the left earlobe was completely amputated. On the upper part of the back, the print of the tractor tire pattern was seen, and on the right leg, a similar pattern was seen. Internal findings showed significant brain edema, bilateral subdural and subarachnoid hemorrhage, and complete horizontal laceration of the pontomedullary junction and basilar artery. The neck organs, along with the tongue, were mostly destroyed, with a partly destroyed pharynx, esophagus, and hard palate. Toxicological analysis detected an alcohol concentration of 3.03 mg/mL in blood, while other substances were excluded. In each case of decapitation, it is necessary to find vital reactions and exclude postmortem mutilation. The cause of death was decapitation, and the manner of death was determined to be accidental. In this case, without witnesses, the autopsy was vital in the reconstruction of the crime scene based on the injuries involved. Macroscopic and microscopic examination of the wound edges showed that the decapitation occurred while the victim was alive, which is a crucial aspect of the autopsy process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.