ArticleCureus2026
Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Philadelphia Chromosome and Complex Karyotype: A Diagnostic Dilemma.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematological malignancy driven by the clonal expansion of immature myeloid cells, with cytogenetic findings playing a defining role in both its diagnosis and risk stratification. The Philadelphia chromosome, generated by the t(9;22)(q34;q11.2) translocation and the resulting BCR-ABL1 fusion gene, is a well-known driver of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Its occurrence in AML, however, is uncommon and carries distinct diagnostic and therapeutic implications that are not always straightforward to navigate. We report a 47-year-old male patient who came to us with a 10-day history of fever, hip pain, and back pain. Blood tests showed anemia and thrombocytopenia, with 49% blasts on peripheral smear. Bone marrow biopsy confirmed acute leukemia with 63% blasts. Cytogenetic studies revealed t(9;22) along with a remarkably complex karyotype, with trisomies of eight chromosomes and tetrasomies of three others. The patient received high-dose cytarabine over three cycles, developed febrile neutropenia requiring amikacin, and was subsequently started on imatinib 400 mg in view of the BCR-ABL1 positivity. He has remained clinically stable at six months of follow-up. To our knowledge, finding Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute myeloid leukemia (Ph+ AML) alongside such a degree of additional chromosomal numerical gains is exceptionally rare. What makes this case worth reporting is the convergence of three issues that each present their own challenges: establishing a diagnosis of de novo AML rather than CML in blast crisis, managing an already aggressive disease made more so by a complex karyotype, and deciding on the role of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in a disease setting where their use is not yet standardized. Detailed cytogenetic workup proved critical in navigating all three.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.