ArticleCureus2026
Perioperative Management Strategies for Fracture Surgery in Patients With Traumatic Pneumothorax: A Retrospective Case Series.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWhen patients with traumatic pneumothorax require fracture surgery, clinicians must decide how to manage the pneumothorax perioperatively. Options include chest tube placement for the pneumothorax itself, prophylactic drainage before surgery, proceeding with general anesthesia and positive pressure ventilation (PPV) without drainage, using alternative anesthetic techniques to avoid PPV, or delaying surgery until the pneumothorax improves. Despite the clinical relevance of this scenario, few studies have described how these strategies are selected in actual perioperative practice.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients with traumatic pneumothorax who underwent fracture surgery at a community hospital in Japan between January 2013 and December 2024. Patient characteristics, pneumothorax size, associated injuries, chest tube management, anesthetic technique, timing of surgery, and perioperative outcomes were extracted from medical records.
resultsNine patients were identified. Management strategies varied and included early chest tube placement for clinical indications independent of surgery (two cases), prophylactic preoperative chest tube placement (one case), regional anesthesia without PPV (one case), and general anesthesia with PPV without chest tube placement (five cases). Among the five patients who underwent general anesthesia with PPV without chest tube placement, those with minimal pneumothoraces underwent early surgery, whereas those with larger pneumothoraces had surgery delayed until improvement was confirmed. No intraoperative tension pneumothorax occurred. One patient with multiple displaced rib fractures projecting into the thoracic cavity developed postoperative pneumothorax progression requiring delayed chest tube drainage.
conclusionsPerioperative management of traumatic pneumothorax in patients undergoing fracture surgery was highly individualized. Pneumothorax size, rib fracture morphology, pneumothorax trajectory, fracture site, surgical urgency, and the availability of regional anesthetic techniques that avoid PPV should be considered in multidisciplinary decision-making. Further studies are needed to define the risk of clinically significant pneumothorax progression during intraoperative PPV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.