ArticleCureus2026
Slow Stapler Firing May Reduce Intraoperative Staple-Line Air Leakage During Pulmonary Resection: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Air leakage after pulmonary resection is one of the most common complications in thoracic surgery and is associated with prolonged chest drainage and increased healthcare costs. Although linear staplers are widely used for pulmonary parenchymal division, the association between stapler firing speed and intraoperative air leakage during pulmonary parenchymal division remains unclear. Methods This retrospective single-center study included 232 patients who underwent pulmonary resection for non-small cell lung cancer between October 2023 and December 2025. Stapling procedures performed using conventional firing modes (approximately 6-10 seconds) were categorized as the fast mode, whereas procedures performed using the slow firing mode (≥20 seconds) were categorized as the slow mode. The primary endpoint was the presence of intraoperative air leakage originating from the staple line during the routine leak test. Surgical videos were retrospectively reviewed to identify staple-line-related air leaks. To adjust for baseline differences between groups, propensity score matching was performed using age, sex, Brinkman index, Goddard score, surgical approach, type of resection, reinforcement material use, and the number of stapler cartridges. Results Among the 232 patients, 147 were assigned to the fast mode group and 85 to the slow mode group. After propensity score matching, 83 matched pairs were analyzed. The incidence of staple-line air leak was lower in the slow mode group than in the fast mode group (n=9 (10.8%) vs. n=19 (22.9%); p=0.036). In univariable analysis, smoking history, Goddard score, and stapling speed were associated with air leakage. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, fast stapler firing (reference: slow firing) was significantly associated with intraoperative staple-line air leakage (OR 3.19; 95% CI: 1.1-6.2; p=0.03). Conclusions Although limited by device heterogeneity and its retrospective design, this study suggests that slower stapler firing may be associated with reduced intraoperative staple-line air leakage. These findings should be considered hypothesis-generating because complete separation of firing-speed effects from device-related factors was not feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.