ArticleSSM. Qualitative research in health2026
"That's not my silo": Navigating fragmented long COVID care in the mid-Atlantic United States.
Article in SSM. Qualitative research in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Long COVID is a chronic illness affecting multiple organ systems, which can be at odds with a highly specialized and siloed U.S. healthcare system. Patients frequently see multiple specialists for diverse symptoms, creating substantial coordination challenges. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 69 U.S. Mid-Atlantic adults diagnosed with or suspected of having Long COVID, recruited through a Long COVID clinic, MyChart patient-portal outreach, and snowball sampling. Interviews were conducted via Zoom, phone, or in person, audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using the Framework Approach. Results: Participants described significant difficulty navigating a fragmented healthcare system characterized by siloed care, communication breakdowns, long wait times, and unclear provider responsibilities, as well as difficulties obtaining a diagnosis. When coordination failed, patients were often forced to organize and direct their own healthcare, a task that was cognitively and physically taxing, particularly for those experiencing brain fog and fatigue, and, for some, ultimately led to delaying or forgoing care. Conclusion: Strengthening care coordination for Long COVID could reduce patient burden and improve access to care. Needed strategies include standardized diagnostic definitions, enhanced primary care roles, interoperable referral pathways, and institutional case conferencing to clarify provider responsibilities. Patient navigators, expanded telehealth options, and community-based support, especially culturally tailored services for disproportionately affected groups, may further reduce fragmentation, scheduling strain, and inequities. Addressing these systemic barriers is essential to creating a more efficient, patient-centered care experience in which patients are no longer responsible for coordinating their own complex care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.