ArticleEnvironmental and occupational health practice2026
Associations between cognitive and personality traits and work productivity loss in desk workers with low back pain: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Environmental and occupational health practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study investigated the associations between cognitive and personality traits and work productivity loss among desk workers with low back pain (LBP). Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 2,223 corporate employees in Japan. Participants completed an online questionnaire assessing work productivity (quantity-quality method), pain intensity (numerical rating scale), disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire), beliefs about LBP (Back Beliefs Questionnaire), and personality traits (Ten Item Personality Inventory). Multiple linear regression analysis examined factors associated with productivity loss. To confirm robustness, a sensitivity analysis was performed limited to participants who identified LBP as the primary cause of their productivity loss. Results: Among the participants, 1,201 (54.0%) reported LBP. Regression analysis indicated that beliefs about LBP (β=-0.40, p=0.011), conscientiousness (β=-0.99, p=0.006), neuroticism (β=1.02, p=0.007), and age (β=-0.18, p=0.002) were significantly associated with work productivity loss. Pain intensity (p=0.139) and functional disability (p=0.574) were not significantly associated with productivity loss. These findings were consistent in the sensitivity analysis, where pain intensity remained unrelated to productivity loss. Conclusions: Psychological and cognitive factors, particularly beliefs about LBP and personality traits, may have a stronger impact on work productivity than physical symptoms among desk workers. Interventions focusing on cognitive restructuring and personality-tailored strategies are necessary to mitigate productivity losses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.