ArticleEnvironmental and occupational health practice2026
The notebook of personal health record system in Japan: framework of post-retirement health checkups for those formerly employed in hazardous occupations.
Article in Environmental and occupational health practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health checkup initiatives for returning Indonesian migrant workers.Environmental and occupational health practice · 2026Article
- Indonesian perspectives in a healthcare focus group discussion on initiating health checkups for returning migrant workers: a preliminary report.Environmental and occupational health practice · 2026Article
- Overseas health checkup initiatives: perspectives on Vietnam.Environmental and occupational health practice · 2026Article
- Occupational health services in Thailand: system, regulation, and the role of overseas health checkup initiatives.Environmental and occupational health practice · 2026Article
- A comparative review of health care and occupational health systems across selected Asian countries.Environmental and occupational health practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Japan is seeing a rapid increase in the numbers of migrant workers from Asian countries amidst a rapidly aging population and declining birthrate. The notebook of personal health record (nPHR) system is a Japanese occupational health service that supports those formerly employed in hazardous work, including migrant workers. This review outlines the structure, scale, and importance of the nPHR scheme and explores Japanese medical institutions that conduct health checkups for former workers with nPHR, offering insights into the potential applicability of similar systems in migrant workers' home countries. Methods: Information on Japanese and international laws and Japanese statistical data was obtained from government websites. Studies of workers with nPHRs were reviewed using the ICHUSHI database. Results: This review outlines the nPHR scheme established under Japanese legislation, summarizing its framework, issuance requirements, and post-retirement health checkups for 15 designated agents/works. In terms of scale, a gradual decline in newly issued nPHRs for major agents/works has been observed in recent years. The system's importance is highlighted through a review of studies involving former workers with nPHRs and an international comparison of post-retirement health checkup systems. Conclusion: Because of the relatively small number of patients with nPHRs, public hospitals are candidates that could be contracted as medical institutions in migrant workers' home countries. Over the past 2 decades, three additional agents/works have been included in the system, and the requirements for asbestos-related nPHRs have been expanded, indicating that the system is actively adapting to evolving occupational health needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.