ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2026
Breathlessness Matters - Australian Cohort Study Evaluating the Impact of a Multidisciplinary, Home-Based Breathlessness Intervention Service Targeting Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Chronic breathlessness causes reduced quality of life (QoL) and high healthcare costs. Accumulating evidence shows that multidisciplinary breathlessness services can ameliorate breathlessness which persists despite guideline-directed treatments. Current literature largely reflects trials of interventions in European settings applied to cancer-predominant populations, raising doubt about broad applicability. The research objective was to evaluate whether Macarthur Breathless Clinic (MBC), a bespoke health service intervention, could reduce the impact of chronic breathlessness for a cohort of Australians with COPD. Methods: The MBC intervention was tested in a prospective, single-arm cohort study, targeting recruitment of 92 patients. Eligible patients had chronic breathlessness impacting QoL and at least moderately severe COPD, defined by spirometry. Following detailed case review to ensure optimal medical therapy, an individualized program was developed and implemented by MBC's multidisciplinary team during a nine-week program. Questionnaires assessing breathlessness burden, mental health and QoL were administered at baseline, repeated on program completion and again at 12 months. Results: Eighty-nine eligible subjects were mean age 71 years, 65% female and 10% Aboriginal Australian with 18% reporting breathlessness at rest. Mean FEV1 was 37% predicted. Compared with baseline, the primary outcome, Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire - Mastery Subscale improved after program completion (0.5 at nine and 0.8 at 52 weeks, p<0.0001). Measures of confidence, COPD symptom burden and breathlessness also yielded durable positive results at 12 months. Conclusion: Clinically relevant gains seen after MBC were retained or even increased at 12 months and more reflected enhanced coping skills and confidence than reduced breathlessness intensity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.